[Scratchbox-devel] Re: SB2 usage for real tasks?
Eugene San
eugenesan at gmail.com
Wed Oct 17 08:38:56 EEST 2007
Hi,
After applying that patch i was able to bootstrap new target and build
libtool.
But later i figured that target not 100% functional. It frequently fails
with "Unsupported syscall: 338 and SegFaults".
I believe the reason for that is that my toolchain is based on
CodeSourcery 2007q1-21 but built with libc2.5.
I wonder if someone has experience with that combination? AFAIK
toolchain based on CodeSourcery 2005q3-2 with libc2.5(from SB1
repository) work fine with qemu-cvs
(http://scratchbox.org/~jhakala/unofficial/scratchbox-devkit-cputransp_1.0.4~200710121350_i386.deb).
Is it GCC 4.2 to blame or qemu-cvs in package mentioned above implements
some additional patches to support glibc2.5?
Ricardo Kekki wrote:
> Lauri Leukkunen wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/07 12:35 +0200, Eugene San wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am giving another try to SB2 and collected several questions, on which i
>>> hope to get some questions here:
>>>
>>> 1) Which toolchains are recommended for use with qemu-0.9.0+20070816-1?
>>> I've tried CodeSourcery 2007q1-21 and qemu fails to run any code
>>> produced by it.
>>> On other hand I've been able to build libtool and kernel with old
>>> CodeSourcery 2005q3-2.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not sure at the moment.
>>
>>
> If you want to use CodeSourcery 2007 toolchains then apply the
> 69_arm_kmb.patch to the qemu-0.9.0+20070816-1. At least for me the
> cs2007q3 is working now fine with sb2. The patch can be found from the
> sb1 repository:
>
> http://scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=1.0/sb-cputransp-devkit;a=commit;h=20071003122255-f1c71-20c3cd8ff2a734acc5e94b6b28132e7225fdf69b.gz
>
>
> Ricardo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-devel/attachments/20071017/c2713a2e/attachment.html
More information about the Scratchbox-devel
mailing list