[Scratchbox-users] scratchbox vs arm eabi nptl

[Matt Hoosier]

My experience is that GDB is still very erratic on its support for ARM
NPTL. When the application that I develop starts doing complex things
with pthreads, the current CVS gdbserver/client will lose track of the
threads' positions and be useless. The same held true when I used the
gdb client/server bundled with CS's 2005q3 and 2006q2.

On 10/3/06, K. Richard Pixley <rich.pixley at palmsource.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason that scratchbox can't support arm eabi nptl?
>
> I'm thinking here of arm eabi in particular.  I understand that
> qemu-user can't currently support nptl but I'm wondering if there is any
> scratchbox work necessary to support nptl aside from the qemu work.
>
> --rich
> _______________________________________________
> Scratchbox-users mailing list
> Scratchbox-users at lists.scratchbox.org
> http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
>