[Scratchbox-users] Re: Select CPU-transparency method: big list

[Jussi Hakala]

Which vanilla version of qemu your patch is included in?

If it's 0.8.2, you are in luck, because a more recent (unofficial) 
version of cputransp devkit can be found from [1].

[1] http://scratchbox.org/~jhakala/unofficial/

Regards,

   Jussi

Claudio Scordino wrote:
> Riku Voipio wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:12:30PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
>>>> You are right. In the future, we might think of eliminating the 
>>>> architectures that are clearly wrong from the selection.
>>>>
>>>> For the toolchain you're using, qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2 might be the one 
>>>> you're looking for.
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>>> But what's the basis for that choice. Where can I learn what these 
>>> are? For instance, what does "sb2" mean, and why is it better for me 
>>> than the other ones?
>>
>> arm = little endian arm
>> armeb = big endian arm
>>
>> Generally the bigger the qemu version, the better. However, all
>> versions qemu are buggy in different ways, so you might actually want
>> to downgrade to older version if hitting problems.
>>
>> If you are working on maemo, please refer to their documentation
>> for selecting preferred qemu version.
>>
>> sb2 means nothing usefull and will be removed in future
>>
> 
> Hi all.
> 
> Last week I downloaded the last stable version of Scratchbox (1.0.7) and 
> I tried to compile for a big-endian arm support.
> Surprisingly, I saw that the Qemu big-endian support is still buggy.
> 
> Then, my question: did you integrate the patch that we proposed several 
> weeks ago ? (see 
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2006-09/msg00137.html)
> 
> In fact, our patched Qemu works fine, whereas Scratchbox Qemu still 
> seems not working...
> 
> Regards,
> 
>             Claudio
> 
> 
>