[Scratchbox-users] Passing flags to qemu

[Diane Holt]

Actually, can you just tell me what --sbox-call is for? Looking at the patch
for it, it seems to just be skipping it anyway (unless I'm missing
something). The comment for the commit that added it said something about a
"calling convention", but I'm not sure what that really means.

Thanks,
Diane

On 10/19/07, Diane Holt <holt.diane at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, the modifications to the qemu I have are not available anywhere else.
> If it needs to get built with the scratchbox patches applied to it, I can
> probably get that done, but I need to know if that's the case, and if so,
> whether all the scratchbox patches get applied, up to and including the one
> for 0.9.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Diane
>
> On 10/19/07, Jussi Hakala <jussi.hakala at movial.fi> wrote:
> >
> > Diane Holt wrote:
> > > I noticed that for 0.9.0 in your repository, there's only one patch
> > file
> > > (to the Makefile, to build static), so do you apply all the patches
> > for
> > > the previous versions as well?
> > >
> > > Sorry to be a bother, but I really need to get this working (this qemu
> > > supports additional features I need that aren't available in the qemu
> > > I'm currently using). I can ask for the one I have to get rebuilt,
> > with
> > > the scratchbox patches applied, if that's what needs to be done.
> >
> > Have you tried the cputransp devkit present in the same location [1]?
> >
> > That snapshot contains qemu-0.8.2 with additional patches and since
> > cputransp version 1.0.3 and onward, there's a cvs snapshot of qemu
> > available. Perhaps the patched version of 0.8.2 or the cvs snapshot
> > could be of use?
> >
> > [1] http://scratchbox.org/~jhakala/unofficial<http://scratchbox.org/%7Ejhakala/unofficial>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >    Jussi
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.scratchbox.org/pipermail/scratchbox-users/attachments/20071022/5d9fd72c/attachment.html